What does the term feminist actually mean?
Let's start with our initial gut reactions to the term. Chances are you have already felt something just by reading the word feminist in print. Maybe it's positive, maybe it's negative. Independent of its dictionary definition, the word feminist has become provocative in recent years. We'll get back to that in a minute.
Here's the dictionary definition:
fem·i·nism
noun \ˈfe-mə-ˌni-zəm\Definition of FEMINISM
1: the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes— fem·i·nist noun or adjective2: organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests
My Facebook friend posted because she gets incensed when she reads articles by people who take a pro-women's-health stance in the recent political debates on birth control, etc. -- yet these authors feel the need to state that they feel this way despite the fact that they are NOT feminists.
Somehow feminist became such a dirty word that people who arguably are feminists (at least, according to definition #1 above) feel the need to disown it.
And this is where Merriam-Webster's role ends and language becomes interesting. Dictionaries can't really capture the social, political, and historical events that give a word a particular connotation (at least, not until years later when that connotation has been well and truly set in stone, rather than being something that's still evolving).
Still, let's look at that definition for a minute. For most people, it's hard to take a stand against definition #1: "the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes." (Notice that religious equality and biological equality are not mentioned; I find that interesting.) If you come out and say that you think women should be subordinate to men, or not vote, or not own property, you sound like an anachronism from at least a century ago. Very few people nowadays would argue that basic women's rights should be taken away.
Definition #2 has a bit more going on. "Organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests." Personally, I am a feminist according to definition #1. But according to definition #2, I am not a feminist. I have never taken part in organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests (unless you count signing the occasional petition on behalf of Planned Parenthood). Taking that into consideration, someone like me might want to disown the term feminist because it is inaccurate.
But people don't get irate because of a simple inaccuracy. People get irate because of the unwritten definition of "feminist" held by certain right-wing conservatives. It might read something like, at its kindest, "Women we hate because they are trying to upset the status quo, and we like the status quo." Or, less kindly, "Man-hating, ball-busting, despicable women who need to be vilified and not taken seriously."
My friend argued on Facebook that we shouldn't allow the right wing to cast a spin on the term feminist. But I find myself coming at this from a more pragmatic perspective. The negative spin exists -- period. It's out there. It's not going anywhere. Fighting its negative spin is fighting a losing battle. I'd rather invent a completely new term -- social equalist, for instance -- and leave the past behind.
What do you think?
I wish I could quote Catherine Redfern's piece in it's entirety, but I'll just paraphrase part of her excellent piece as to why the term "feminist" is seen as "dirty" - it's because our culture in general still doesn't attach as much value to women as it does to men:
ReplyDelete"Yet sadly, this "improving women's lives is sexist" attitude reflects part of the wider mainstream fear of feminism. It's why people say things like 'I'm not a feminist, I'm a humanist' or 'I'm not a feminist, I'm in favour of human rights'. It's because there is a stigma attached to any activism that unashamedly benefits women, as a social group. It's not seen as worthy enough, and fighting on behalf of women as a group is embarassing somehow."
It's also because feminism seeks to remove the walls between "masculine and feminine" behaviors, which leads to more fluidity of expression for both men and women - it's ok for men to cry at movies without being labeled "sissies" and it's ok for women to be aggressive in the boardroom without being labeled as "cutthroat bitches." Without definitive "male" and "female" behavior, it's impossible to elevate one as "superior" and the other as "inferior" which takes away the foundation of patriarchy.
Redfern's piece is worth a read. http://www.thefword.org.uk/features/2003/09/feminists_are_sexist
Other excellent resources on feminism:
Feminism 101 (great for those just getting their toes wet and looking to educate themselves about basic feminist principles - hint: you don't need to be a woman to be a feminist) http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/
Shakesville (for more indepth exploration of feminism, intersectionality, privilege, etc): http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/
And for pure misogyny mockery, Manboobz, written by a male feminist (possible trigger warnings as he focuses a lot of takedowns of Men's Rights Activists (MRAs) hate sites: http://manboobz.com/